(cause all you'll have done is loosen that fastener inside just enough that the whole thing really turns freely. I'd try the strap wrench first: if this case is the state of affairs, you likely either won't be able to budge it anyway, or you'll be able to turn the base of the housing but the head still won't come off. not really expected to be taken apart for light stands or cannibalization, I suppose. (The only other possibility I can think of is that underneath a plug or cover is a screw or other fastener that goes right down into the column or onto the same screw that the ballheads come on (like you'd see if you flipped the camera platform out of the way, looking straight down from above.) They made some older aluminum-channel tripods that way, at least. If the panning won't lock enough to let you remove it, maybe you can get a strap or chain wrench around the base of it and remove it that way? I'm guessing there's no room for any kind of set screws underneath where it mounts to. Turning it one way or another and it just spins and spins.B&H's listing seems to imply that one also simply screws on there: it says "Head mount thread size 1/4:" I presume that means it's basically the same as the ballhead's reported to be. That's what God gave us shake reduction for!īut it is designed to rotate. Highly recommended! But even so, I have just decided never to take a tripod on another holiday. It even came with a camera bag, though that is made useless by a too-small strap. The leg clasps are easy to use, unlike the monsters on my Manfrotto monopod. The centre column is reversible by the simple expedient of unscrewing it and attaching the pieces back in upside down. Just remember to push the leg in slightly, pop up the tab to the next position, then pull the leg out until it clicks. It took me a moment to understand and then I was blown away by the elegant design solution. The legs lock at different angles and the mechanism is very cool. But please do not start comparing it with a 300 or 500 pound professional unit! Those would be a lot bulkier anyway. For that price I cannot imagine a better built item. Otherwise I could have got away paying ten quid less. I paid 70 pounds sterling since I didn't want the ball head and could find only one vendor with this specific head. In fact I am totally impressed by the build of this thing for the price. Certainly as big as any I would take travelling. I don't use huge lenses, but I have no problem trusting my K20D on this. Thing is, I'm pretty confident that this head would bear more weight than a cheap little ball head. One knob loosens to change rotation and pitch. One thing I have never seen noted, so let me be the first to say it: this tripod is available with two different heads! Everyone seems to get the ball head, model SBH-100DQ, but instead I purchased a three-way head. ![]() Also, until recently the legs did not have foam padding at the top. Earlier models did not come with a quick-release plate on the head, which would be a serious downer. Note that this tripod has improved over the years. He liked it but decided to return it as it was not sturdy enough to bear the weight of his system. Steve from Vancouver provided the impetus for a nice thread on the tripod in January 2009. It is certainly a popular enough model to have garnered a good number of mentions and even some more comprehensive reviews.Īnd of course Pentax Forums came to the rescue. For instance I can be pretty sure this tripod will not bear a weight of 63.78 lbs! While it was difficult to get official info on this tripod, retailers like Microglobe provide a run-down. Tired of heavier tripods, and needing one that could fit into today's highly restrictive baggage allowances, I purchased a Slik Sprint Pro II three weeks ago, from a UK supplier through eBay.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |